Some musings on Cauchy-Schwarz, Part IVc

 To conclude Part IV, we prove the easy fact that all two-dimensional real inner product spaces are "essentially the same" as R2 with the usual dot product and the associated (Euclidean) norm x2=xx.

Of course what we need is a linear isomorphism which preserves norms and inner products. The argument is almost identical to that in Part III (and, unsurprisingly, generalises via the usual Gram-Schmidt process to higher dimensions).

As an exercise you should check for yourselves the details of any unproven claims below.

Now let V be any two-dimensional inner product space over R, with inner product ,V and associated norm V.

Let {v1,v2} be a basis of V. Then v10, so we can normalize by setting

e1=1v1Vv1.

Then {e1,v2} is easily seen to still be a basis of V.

Next we write v2=a+b with a=e1,v2e1 being the component of v2 along e1 and b=v2a being the component of v2 perpendicular to e1. Explicitly (as in the Gram-Schmidt process)

b=v2e1,v2e1.

We have b0 (because {e1,v2} is a linearly independent set), and so we may normalise by setting e2=1bVb. Then it is easy to see that {e1,e2} is an orthonormal basis of V

Define a map T:R2V by T((x,y))=xe1+ye2. Then T is easily seen to be a bijection. Moreover, T is a linear isomorphism, and for all x,yR2, we have (via Pythagoras etc.)

T(x)V=x2

and

T(x),T(y)V=xy.

In other words, the linear isomorphism T preserves norms and inner products. (It is an isomorphism of real inner product spaces.)

We can use T and its inverse T1 to transfer any inner product space properties we have back and forth between R2 and V, and it is in this sense that all two-dimensional real inner product spaces are "essentially the same" as R2 with the usual dot product. In particular, the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality holds for all two-dimensional real inner product spaces because it holds for the dot product in R2.

In Part Va we see how the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for general real inner product spaces follows easily from this (for the reasons we indicated before). Then in Part Vb we recall how to deduce the version for complex inner product spaces from the version for real inner product spaces, and give a quick summary of everything we have discussed so far. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A rule of thumb for when to use the Ratio Test

An introduction to the Hahn-Banach extension theorem: Part VI

An introduction to the Weierstrass M-test: Part I