Posts

Showing posts from September, 2021

Quantifier packaging when teaching convergence of sequences

Here is another one of my old posts, from way back in 2008. In fact I originally posted this here on Blogger, before I was persuaded to move over to WordPress. (In those days LaTeX wasn't available on Blogger. But now I can use MathJax here.) I deleted the version here on Blogger at some point, but now I have come full circle! I still think that the notion of absorption (and similar "quantifier packaging" ideas) could be very helpful to at least some students! But, as far as I know, the notion hasn't really really caught on, and I only have anecdotal evidence supporting my approach. See the WordPress post for comments on this idea from, among others, Professor Sir Tim Gowers. I'm repeating the post here mostly because the maths looks better here now using MathJax (though this particular example isn't a fair comparison, since the version of this post on WordPress doesn't actually use LaTeX). But also, it would be great if

FPM quiz question on permutations

Image
Here is another question and (partial) answer from my FPM Piazza forum last autumn, this time related to the "challenge question" from my First quiz on permutations . First, here is a screenshot of the relevant quiz question. (You can click on the image to view it full size.) Challenge question from first FPM quiz on permutations

Cartesian squares and ordered pairs

Here is another question and answer from my FPM Piazza forum last autumn. Question: Suppose that \(S\) is a set with two elements, say \(S=\{a,b\}\). When looking at elements of the Cartesian square \(S \times S\), are \((a,b)\) and \((b,a)\) the same element, or are they different elements? Does \(S \times S\) have four different elements, or only three? My answer: Hi, The key term in the definition of Cartesian squares, and generally Cartesian products, is "ordered pair". When you use standard round brackets in this way, the order does matter. You have specified a first coordinate and a second coordinate. For example, if you work in \(\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} = \mathbb{R}^2\), the point \((1,0)\) (which lies on the x-axis) is different from the point \((0,1)\) (on the y-axis). Many of the sets \(S\) we have looked at are subsets of \(\mathbb{R}\), and this results in \(S \times S\) being a subset of \(\mathbb{R}^2\). When this happens, you can often th