An introduction to the Weierstrass M-test: Part IV

I think this will be the last post in this series. This time we will look at the special case of power series, using Theorem 5 from the previous part to help us to justify differentiation term by term.

Notation: Recall that we denote the set  N{0} of non-negative integers by N0.

Recall the statement of our Theorem 5.

Theorem 5 (Term by term differentiation of series)

Let I be a nondegenerate interval in R, and let Mn (nN0) be non-negative real numbers such that n=0Mn<.

Let fn (nN0) be differentiable functions from I to R, and suppose that, for all nN0 and all xI, we have |fn(x)|Mn.

Suppose further that, for  all xI, the series n=0fn(x) converges.

Define f:IR by

f(x)=n=0fn(x).

Then f is differentiable on I, and, for each xI,

f(x)=n=0fn(x).

We are now ready to prove our main result about power series.

Theorem 6 (convergence and differentiability of power series)

Let x0R, and let an (nN0) be real numbers. Let t0R with t0x0, and suppose that the series n=0an(t0x0)n converges.

Set R=|t0x0|, and set J=(x0R,x0+R). Then the following hold.

(a) For all xJ, both of the series n=0an(xx0)n and n=1nan(xx0)n1   converge absolutely (and hence they converge).

(b) Define f:JR by

f(x)=n=0an(xx0)n.

Then f is differentiable on J and, for all xJ,

f(x)=n=1nan(xx0)n1.

Comments

  • We are investigating the convergence of the power series n=0an(xx0)n, and the properties of the resulting function.
  • We assume that the series converges when x=t0 for some particular t0x0. The existence of such a t0 is not guaranteed. (It depends on the sequence.) Of course the series does always converge when x=x0.
  • If we actually know that the series converges for all xR, then the rest of the theorem also applies for all xR. For example, this applies to the standard power series for exp, sin and cos.
  • Our proof of Theorem 6 uses Theorem 5, but we won't set I=J, because we can't be sure that the conditions of Theorem 5 are satisfied on J. Fortunately it is enough to prove that, for all r(0,R), Theorem 5 applies on (x0r,x0+r). (Or we can work on [x0r,x0+r].)
  • All we really need to know about R here is that the sequence |an|Rn is bounded.
  • Several parts of our argument resemble the proof we gave in class of the Ratio Test for series.
Proof of Theorem 6

Since n=0an(t0x0)n converges, we must have that an(t0x0)n0 as n, and so (in particular) this sequence is bounded. Since R=|t0x0|, this tells us that the sequence |an|Rn is bounded. Set
K=sup{|an|Rn:nN0}.
(Or any other upper bound will do.)
This K is constant in this proof. We may assume that K>0, as the whole result is trivial otherwise.

(a) Let xJ=(x0R,x0+r). Then |xx0|<R. Set α=|xx0|/R[0,1). The case where x=x0 is trivial, so we may assume that α(0,1)

We have |an(xx0)n|=|an|RnαnKαn.
Since α<1, k=0Kαn is a convergent geometric series. So, by the comparison test, the series 
n=0an(xx0)n
is absolutely convergent, and hence convergent. 

Similarly, with x and α as above, for each nN, we have
|nan(xx0)n1|=n|an|Rn1αn1=nRαn1|an|RnKRnαn1.
Set bn=KRnαn1>0.
We may now apply the ratio test to show that the series n=1bn converges (but see also the final comment at the very end of this post). For each nN, we have 
|bn+1||bn|=bn+1bn=n+1nαα
as n. Since α<1, the series n=1bn converges.
By the comparison test, the series 
n=1nan(xx0)n1
is absolutely convergent, and hence convergent.

(b) For each nN0, define fn:JR by fn(x)=an(xx0)n. In particular, f0(x)=a0, a constant function.

We define f:JR by

f(x)=n=0an(xx0)n=n=0fn(x).

(We know that this series converges for each xJ by (a).)

We now wish to apply Theorem 5. But to do this we have to work on slightly smaller intervals, in order to obtain the constants Mn we need.

It is enough to prove that, for all r(0,R), the result holds for all x(x0r,x0+r).

Let  r(0,R), and set I=(x0r,x0+r). Set β=r/R(0,1).

For each nN0, set fn(x)=an(xx0)n. In particular, f0(x)=a0, a constant function.

Each function fn is differentiable on I and, for nN and xI, we have 

fn(x)=nan(xx0)n1.

For n=0 there could be an issue with this expression when x=x0, but in any case f0(x)=0 and this won't affect anything.

We for xI and nN, we have

|fn(x)|=n|an||xx0|n1n|an|rn1=1rn|an|rn=1rnβn|an|RnKrnβn.

For each nN0, set Mn=Krnβn. Then, for all xI and all nN0, we have

|fn(x)|Mn

(Here n=0 is a trivial special case.)

In order to apply Theorem 5, all we need now is to show that the series n=0Mn converges. We can ignore the term M0=0

Recall that β(0,1) here. For each nN, we have

Mn=Krnβn>0.

(We eliminated the case K=0 as trivial earlier. But we could always work with K+1 instead. We could also use n+1 if we wanted to include n=0.)

We may now apply the ratio test for series (but see also the final comment below). We have 

|Mn+1||Mn|=Mn+1Mn=n+1nββ<1

as  n. Thus we have

n=0Mn<,

and so we can apply Theorem 5 to see that f is differentiable on (x0r,x0+r), with

f(x)=n=0fn(x)=n=1nan(xx0)n1

for all x(x0r,x0+r).

Since this is true for all r(0,R), the result holds for all xJ=(x0R,x0+R).

Comments

  • If we had tried to use I=J=(x0R,x0+R) directly, we would not have obtained suitable Mn this way, because we would have had r=R, β=1, and then n=0Krnβn diverges.
  • With only a little more work, we see that we can continue to differentiate our power series term by term on J=(x0R,x0+R) as often as we like. So f is infinitely differentiable on J, and the derivatives are exactly what we expect. We can't necessarily use the same t0 for the higher derivatives. But if we take any R1(x0R,x0+R), we can use the same interval J1=(x0R1,x0+R1) for all of the derivatives. Indeed, we then have, for each kN,
    n(n1)(nk+1)anRnk10 as n, which is enough for us to obtain the next order derivative.
  • For  each t(1,1) the series n=1ntn1 is actually a fairly standard convergent series, with sum 1/(1t)2. Given this, we can multiply by any constant CR to see that (for such t)
    n=1Cntn1=C(1t)2,
    and similarly
    n=1Cntn=n=1Ctntn1=Ct(1t)2.
    Quoting these (with t=α and t=β above) would save us two applications of the ratio test, because we would already know those series converge.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A rule of thumb for when to use the Ratio Test

An introduction to the Hahn-Banach extension theorem: Part VI

Discussion of the proof that the uniform norm really is a norm