An introduction to the Weierstrass M-test: Part III

In this post, following on from the first two posts in the series, we look at differentiating suitable series of functions term by term. We make as much use as possible of the Weierstrass M-test (in the spirit of this series of posts), instead of discussing uniform convergence in general. Of course, uniform convergence is an important topic, and I'll come back to it at some point.

First we recall a characterization of differentiability in terms of "chord functions".

Note, for functions defined on intervals, when we discuss differentiability at endpoints (if any) of the interval, we use one-sided derivatives.

Proposition 3 (Differentiability in terms of chord functions)

Let I be a non-degenerate interval in R, let f:IR, and let x0I. Then the following statements are equivalent.

(a) The function f is differentiable at x0.

(b)  There is a function g:IR such that g is continuous at x0 and, for all xI,
f(x)=f(x0)+(xx0)g(x).

Comments

  • Under these conditions, we then have f(x0)=g(x0) and, for all xI{x0}, we have
    g(x)=f(x)f(x0)xx0.
  • For such x, g(x) is the gradient of the chord joining (x0,f(x0)) to (x,f(x)). 
  • I have seen g called the chord function for f, but this may not be standard. Of course if we change x0 we need a different function. 
  • In my recent analysis lectures I called this function g the chord function for f at x0. But possibly "centred at x0" would have been better.
  • In the lecture notes I was following, written by my colleague Matthias Kurzke, the function g was denoted by ˆf. 

We omit the easy proof of Proposition 3 (but the details were covered in the live class and in the printed notes). 

Notation: Recall that we denote the set  N{0} of non-negative integers by N0.

For the rest of this post, I will be a non-degenerate interval, and Mn(nN0) will be non-negative real numbers with n=0Mn<.

Next, for convenience, we combine Theorems 1 and 2 from the previous post, in terms of functions gn. We'll call this Proposition 4. See the previous post for details of the proof.

Proposition 4 (Selected portions of the Weierstrass M-test)

Let gn (nN0) be functions from I to R, and suppose that, for all nN0 and all xI, we have |gn(x)|Mn.

(a) For each xI, the series n=0gn(x) is absolutely convergent (and hence convergent).

(b) Define a function g:IR by

g(x)=n=0gn(x).

Let x0I, and suppose that, for all nN0, gn is continuous at x0. Then g is also continuous at x0.

Combining Propositions 3 and 4 allows us to prove a result about differentiability of sums of series.

Theorem 5 (Term by term differentiation of series)

Let fn (nN0) be differentiable functions from I to R, and suppose that, for all nN0 and all xI, we have |fn(x)|Mn.

Suppose further that, for  all xI, the series n=0fn(x) converges.

Define f:IR by

f(x)=n=0fn(x).

Then f is differentiable on I, and, for each xI,

f(x)=n=0fn(x).

Comments

  • It is enough to assume that n=0fn(a) for at least one point aI, as (given the other assumptions) it then follows that n=0fn(x) converges for all xI. We do not require this to be absolute convergence.
  • We do know that, for each xI, the series n=0fn(x) converges absolutely.
Proof of Theorem 5

Let x0I. Since each function fn is differentiable at x0, by Proposition 3, we can find functions gn:IR (nN0) such that each gn is continuous at x0, and, for all xI,
fn(x)=fn(x0)+(xx0)gn(x).
We then have fn(x0)=gn(x0) and, for all xI{x0}, we have
gn(x)=fn(x)fn(x0)xx0.

Since |fn(t)|Mn for all tI, we can apply the Mean Value Theorem to see that |gn(x)|Mn for all xI{x0}, and we also have |gn(x0)|=|fn(x0)|Mn. So we can apply Theorem 4 to define g:IR by

g(x)=n=0gn(x),

and this function g is continuous at x0, with 

g(x0)=n=0gn(x0)=n=0fn(x0).

Let xI. Then 

f(x)=n=0fn(x)=n=0(fn(x0)+(xx0)gn(x))

=n=0fn(x0)+(xx0)n=0gn(x)=f(x0)+(xx0)g(x).

By Proposition 3 again, since g is continuous at x0, it follows that f is differentiable at x0 with f(x0)=g(x0)=n=0fn(x0), as required.

In the next part, we will look at the special case of power series.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A rule of thumb for when to use the Ratio Test

An introduction to the Hahn-Banach extension theorem: Part VI

Discussion of the proof that the uniform norm really is a norm