An introduction to the Weierstrass M-test: Part I

In order to make these posts accessible to first-year undergraduate students, I am going to be working with real-valued functions defined on intervals in R. I'm also going to avoid focusing on uniform convergence for sequences of functions, and instead focus on absolute convergence of series of functions, and how this fits with continuity. I'll then start to look at differentiability.

For those interested in my approach to teaching uniform convergence for sequences of functions, I have a video about this on YouTube (at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mB4Yny0T3HA). Students watching this video should be warned that my non-standard notion of "absorption" (intended to help students understand convergence of sequences properly) has not really caught on! Other lecturers are unlikely to know about this notion of absorption, and so you should avoid using that terminology unless you explain it locally. However, if you want to know more about my absorption approach, see my blog post at https://explaining-maths.blogspot.com/2021/09/quantifier-packaging-when-teaching.html

Notation:

For convenience, we denote the set  N{0} of non-negative integers by N0.

Throughout these posts, I will be a non-degenerate interval in R, and (fn)n=0 will be a sequence of functions from I to R

(For example, we might have fn(x)=xn/n! for each nN0 and xI.)

It is slightly more common to start from n=1, but if we are going to work with power series, starting from n=0 is probably a slightly better fit.

In this post, we are going to give a sufficient condition for the convergence, for all xI, of the series

 n=0fn(x).

We are also going to make a preliminary investigation, in this setting, of the properties of the function

xn=0fn(x).

We can certainly look at the partial sums of the series. So for each mN0 we define the function Sm:IR by Sm=mn=0fn. So, for each xI, we have

Sm(x)=mn=0fn(x).

For the rest of this post, let (Mn)n=0 be a sequence of non-negative real numbers such that

 n=0Mn<,

i.e., this series (with non-negative real terms) is convergent.

For each mN0, set Rm=n=m+1Mn.

Then Rm0 as m, because the "tails of a convergent series" always tend to 0.

The following theorem is part of the result known as the Weierstrass M-test 

Theorem 1 (Part of the Weierstrass M-test)

Suppose that, for all nN0 and all xI, we have

|fn(x)|Mn.

Then, for all xI, the series

 n=0fn(x)

is absolutely convergent, and so we may define f:IR by

 f(x)=n=0fn(x).

Then for all mN0 and all xI we have

|Sm(x)f(x)|Rm

(where Rm is as defined above). 

Comments

Note that the real numbers Rm do not depend on x.

The sequence (Rm)m=0 is non-increasing (R0R1R2) and converges to 0.

In the language of uniform convergence (but see comments at the start of this post), it follows that the partial sum functions Sm converge to f uniformly on I.

Now that we have stated this theorem, the proof is fairly easy! I'll give the proof in Part II.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A rule of thumb for when to use the Ratio Test

An introduction to the Hahn-Banach extension theorem: Part VI

Discussion of the proof that the uniform norm really is a norm