Quiz question on prime factorization

Last year many of us at the University of Nottingham created Moodle quizzes for our students to practise on. I had some fun with the technical aspects of this, and may post on that another time. Typically my FPM quizzes would have a few relatively routine questions, followed by a "challenge" question (clearly labelled as such) which was intended to stretch them. Quite often we would discuss the challenge questions in the "live" sessions. I also made a small number of "challenge quizzes" (clearly labelled again) where all of the questions were challenge questions.

Here is a Piazza post I made to explain one of the "relatively routine" quiz questions related to prime factorization.

FPM First quiz on Prime Factorization: question 3

Hi everyone,

I have been asked about this quiz question, from the First quiz on Prime Factorization.

This is really all about divisibility by primes, and highest powers of primes dividing natural numbers.

First let's see why (a) is correct.

Let kN and suppose that k3 is divisible by 25.
Then certainly 5|k3 and so, since 5 is prime, 5|k too.
So there is an integer n with k=5n, and then we have k2=25n2 so (since n2 is an integer) we have 25|k2.
This shows that (a) is true for all positive integers k.

Another way to think about this is as follows. Let mN{0} be the highest power of 5 dividing k.  (Note that kN, so this makes sense.)
Then the highest power of 5 dividing k3 is 3m. (As we saw in Workshop 5.)
But k3 is divisible by 25=52, so we must have 3m2, and so m2/3. But m is an integer, so m1. Finally, the highest power of 5 dividing k2 is 2m, and m1, so 2m2, and so we obtain 52|k2, as required.

Well, maybe that wasn't very exciting! But suppose that the question had used 625=54 instead of 25. Then in our argument above we would have had m4/3 instead. So, because m is an integer, we would have had m2. In fact, you can use these ideas to prove that, for all natural numbers k, we have      54|k352|k56|k3. [Exercise!]
Moreover, the same argument works for any other prime number, not just 5. And if you play around with the argument you can establish some fairly general results.

OK, now (b) to (d) are supposed to be false (meaning here that there is at least one positive integer k for which the relevant implication fails).
If we want to check this, we should look for counterexamples.
For example, for (b), k=2 gives a counterexample, because then 16|k4 but k3=8 is not divisible by 16.

I think I can leave it to you to find similar counterexamples for (c) and (d).

Best wishes,
Dr Feinstein

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A rule of thumb for when to use the Ratio Test

An introduction to the Hahn-Banach extension theorem: Part VI

Discussion of the proof that the uniform norm really is a norm